Skip to content

Feedback on Tools and Libraries #2067

@LunaticMuch

Description

@LunaticMuch

I have been looking around for a libraries for Swift and I found maybe two opportunities:

  1. Should not we have a link on each tile coming out on the website? E.g. on the website I can see the title and the description of a client, but there's no link. Although, the link exists in the source markdown file. It should link both the website and the Github repo.
  2. Should not we have a tag to mark a library as old or stale or whatever we want to say to indicate there's no active development? Surely, I can infer going on the Github. website, but the website could be helpful. In this case, for instance, the website link is broken, the homepage contains no info and the GitHub repo is wrong. Despite the CocoaPod still exists, it's unlikely there are users of this library.
  3. For those clients or servers where a GitHub repo exists, the readme could be pulled automatically, as much as npmjs.org does.

I think it would improve a lot the experience of the user.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions