Skip to content

build: Packaging error #3772

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

build: Packaging error #3772

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

build: Packaging error

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jul 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit e28ea0d into v2 Jul 30, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_build branch July 30, 2025 02:25
paramSetting: (id: string) =>
hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_MODEL_EDIT], 'OR'),
delete: (id: string) =>
hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_MODEL_DELETE], 'OR'),

folderCreate: () => false,
folderEdit: () => false,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no obvious issues in the provided code snippet. However, there is one minor improvement:

// Add type annotations to parameters
modify: (id: string) =>
  hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_MODEL_EDIT], 'OR'),

paramSetting: (id: string) =>
  hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_MODEL_EDIT], 'OR'),

delete: (id: string) =>
  hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_MODEL_DELETE], 'OR');

Adding type annotations (string and Permission) helps clarify what the function expects as input and can enhance readability for other developers working with this code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant