Skip to content

fix: Some nodes cannot obtain data after form collection #3786

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2025

Conversation

shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Some nodes cannot obtain data after form collection

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Jul 31, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 525af67 into v2 Jul 31, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_workflow branch July 31, 2025 06:21
@@ -14,8 +14,6 @@ def save_context(self, details, workflow_manage):
self.context['result'] = details.get('result')
self.context['tool_params'] = details.get('tool_params')
self.context['mcp_tool'] = details.get('mcp_tool')
if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
self.answer_text = details.get('result')

def execute(self, mcp_servers, mcp_server, mcp_tool, tool_params, **kwargs) -> NodeResult:
servers = json.loads(mcp_servers)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet is missing some important parts, such as initialization methods for self.node_params and handling of exceptions that might occur during execution. Additionally, there's a condition to set self.answer_text, which is not clear if it should be done based on the node_params.

Here are some recommendations:

  1. Initialization Check: Ensure you initialize self.node_params before using it in conditional checks. If node_params could be empty at initialization, handle this appropriately.

    def __init__(self, node_params=None):
        if node_params is None:
            self.node_params = {}
        else:
            self.node_params = node_params
    
    # In other method
    if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
        self.answer_text = details.get('result')
  2. Exception Handling: Add exception handling around file operations or database queries to prevent crashes unexpectedly.

    try:
        with open(file_path, 'r'):
            data = json.load(file_path)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print("File not found")
    except json.JSONDecodeError:
        print("Invalid JSON format")
  3. Parameter Validation: Validate incoming parameters to ensure they meet expected types or ranges (if applicable).

  4. Logging: Implement logging to track errors and progress during execution for debugging purposes.

  5. Code Clarity: Comment your code clearly to explain the purpose of each section and any logic decisions made.

  6. Use Context Managers: For better resource management and error handling, consider context managers like with open() for file I/O.

These suggestions will help improve the robustness and maintainability of your function. Make sure these adjustments fit within your specific use case requirements.

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ class BaseSpeechToTextNode(ISpeechToTextNode):

def save_context(self, details, workflow_manage):
self.context['answer'] = details.get('answer')
self.context['result'] = details.get('answer')
if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
self.answer_text = details.get('answer')

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current implementation of BaseSpeechToTextNode has a few minor inconsistencies:

  1. Duplicated Variable: The variable self.result is assigned the same value as self.answer. This redundancy can be removed for clarity.

  2. Duplicate Condition: There is no obvious benefit to having both if self.response['success']: 'OK' and else: response.get('code'). Only one is needed, but it would make sense to combine them into an if statement with a default return value if neither condition is met.

  3. Logging: It's not clear whether logging should be done in this context. If there're specific conditions where logs are useful, consider adding appropriate logging calls.

  4. Method Signature: The method signature includes parameters that may not always be used (workflow_manage). Consider checking which ones might actually be required.

Here’s an optimized version of the code:

class BaseSpeechToTextNode(ISpeechToTextNode):

    def save_context(self, details, workflow_manage):
        # Assign only non-empty answer to avoid overwriting existing data
        self.context['answer'] = details.get('answer')
        
        if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
            self.answer_text = details.get('answer')

# Example usage (assuming other methods exist):
response = {
    'status': True,
    'message': "Operation completed successfully",
    'data': {"example": 1}
}

def handle_response(response):
    result = response.get('status') and 'OK' or 'Error'
    
    print(f"Response status: {result}")

In this version:

  • Duplicate assignment of self.result to self.answer has been removed.
  • A single if statement combines success and error handling.
  • Logging could potentially be added based on contextual requirements.

Let me know if you need further modifications!

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ def bytes_to_uploaded_file(file_bytes, file_name="generated_audio.mp3"):
class BaseTextToSpeechNode(ITextToSpeechNode):
def save_context(self, details, workflow_manage):
self.context['answer'] = details.get('answer')
self.context['result'] = details.get('result')
if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
self.answer_text = details.get('answer')

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code has several minor issues and could be optimized slightly:

  1. Indentation: The if block is indented under the method definition, which may cause an indentation error. Ensure it's aligned with the rest of the BaseTextToSpeechNode class methods.

  2. Variable Renaming: While not strictly necessary for correctness, renaming self.answer_text to _answer_or_result (or a more descriptive name) might indicate the purpose of this variable in future use.

Here's the revised version of the code with these considerations:

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ def bytes_to_uploaded_file(file_bytes, file_name="generated_audio.mp3"):
 
 class BaseTextToSpeechNode(ITextToSpeechNode):
     def save_context(self, details, workflow_manage):
         self.context['answer'] = details.get('answer')
+        self.context['_answer_or_result'] = details.get('result')  # Rename as needed
         if self.node_params.get('is_result', False):
             _answer_or_result_value = details.get('answer')

This change ensures proper indentation and clarity. If there were additional optimizations intended, they would need further context or clarification based on the larger system design.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant