Skip to content

[8.19] Fix LocalPhysicalPlanOptimizerTests #132180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

carlosdelest
Copy link
Member

Applies fix from #129569 to LocalPhysicalPlanOptimizerTests

Closes #131901

@carlosdelest carlosdelest added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL v8.19.0 :Search Relevance/ES|QL Search functionality in ES|QL labels Jul 30, 2025
@carlosdelest carlosdelest marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2025 15:46
@carlosdelest carlosdelest requested a review from a team July 30, 2025 15:46
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Search Relevance Meta label for the Search Relevance team in Elasticsearch label Jul 30, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-relevance (Team:Search Relevance)

@carlosdelest carlosdelest requested a review from GalLalouche July 30, 2025 15:46
@carlosdelest
Copy link
Member Author

Test failures are not related to this change.

@carlosdelest carlosdelest merged commit 1a0ff3d into elastic:8.19 Jul 30, 2025
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL :Search Relevance/ES|QL Search functionality in ES|QL Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Search Relevance Meta label for the Search Relevance team in Elasticsearch >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v8.19.0 v8.19.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants