Skip to content

tags-access: showcase implicit public access #105

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

tags-access: showcase implicit public access #105

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

chikamichi
Copy link

Hi,

Removing the @public tag in the comparative example could make sense as it would demonstrate the implicit access (that is, public).

What do you think about that change?

@hegemonic
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the suggestion. I'd prefer to keep the example as-is, since it shows a valid use of the @public tag.

(Also, the current page for the @access tag is not quite correct--in JSDoc 3.3.0, using the @public tag is a little different from omitting the tag. I need to update this page to make that clear. Thanks for helping me figure this out!)

@hegemonic hegemonic closed this Feb 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants