add have_all_attributes_in

[mkamensky]

Added another matcher to check that all attributes are included in the given list

[stas]

@mkamensky could you please help us understand how is this different from the have_attributes matcher?

[mkamensky]

@mkamensky could you please help us understand how is this different from the have_attributes matcher?

As far as I understand, have_attributes checks that all given attributes exist. This one checks that there are no other attributes included (my use case authorization, I want to make sure that only the permitted attributes are returned).

[stas]

@mkamensky I don't think we should introduce a new matcher. Let's use the existing one and extend it's functionality using a parameter/chained call. If that's ok with you and you want to submit a PR, I'll be happy to take a look. Alternatively, I'll be looking into #4 and will review this one along with it.

[stas]

Superseded by #14