Skip to content

Fix update_component tool to surface errors when updates fail #70

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

wojciech-golowkow
Copy link
Contributor

@wojciech-golowkow wojciech-golowkow commented Jul 30, 2025

Summary

The update_component tool used to return a success state even when it silently failed to persist changes to one or more component fields.
This pull request changes that behaviour: whenever any field update fails, the tool now returns an error state with a clear reason, so agents immediately know that their changes were not applied.


Problem

  • Agents were misled by a success response, assuming their updates were saved.
  • The silent failure caused inconsistent component data and wasted debugging time.

Solution

  • Error propagation – If any write operation on a component field fails, the tool now:
    1. Stops further updates.
    2. Returns status: "error" and a descriptive message detailing which field(s) failed and why.

🔧 This PR fixes the update_component tool to properly surface errors when component field updates fail, replacing silent failures with clear error messages. Previously, the tool would return success even when field updates failed, misleading agents about the actual state of their changes.

🔍 Detailed Analysis

Key Changes

  • Error Handling: Modified UpdateComponentData method to return success/failure status with detailed error messages via an out parameter
  • Response Logic: Updated main execution flow to check update results and return appropriate error responses when field updates fail
  • State Management: Reorganized dirty marking and prefab recording to only occur after successful updates
  • Validation: Added null/empty field name validation to prevent processing invalid data

Technical Implementation

flowchart TD
    A[Execute update_component] --> B{Component exists?}
    B -->|No| C[Add component + mark dirty]
    B -->|Yes| D[Use existing component]
    C --> E{Has component data?}
    D --> E
    E -->|Yes| F[UpdateComponentData]
    E -->|No| G[Return success]
    F --> H{Update successful?}
    H -->|No| I{Was component added?}
    H -->|Yes| J[Mark dirty + record prefab]
    I -->|Yes| K[Return partial success error]
    I -->|No| L[Return update error]
    J --> G
Loading

Impact

  • Error Transparency: Agents now receive immediate feedback when field updates fail, preventing confusion about component state
  • Debugging Efficiency: Clear error messages specify which fields failed and why, reducing troubleshooting time
  • Data Consistency: Prevents scenarios where agents assume changes were applied when they actually failed silently
  • Partial Success Handling: Distinguishes between cases where component addition succeeded but field updates failed

Created with Palmier

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CoderGamester
Copy link
Owner

Good improvement
Thank you @wojciech-golowkow

@CoderGamester CoderGamester merged commit af8a16d into CoderGamester:main Jul 30, 2025
1 check passed
@wojciech-golowkow wojciech-golowkow deleted the feature-enhance-update-component branch July 30, 2025 18:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants