Skip to content

Resolve invalid type Int in syntax references #5628

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

Resolve invalid type Int which will cause syntax errors. Here are the relevant snippets from my local copy of the headers:

_com_ptr_t Relational Operators

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.44.35207\include\comip.h:

Line 385-393

    bool operator==(int null) const
    {
        if (null != 0)
        {
            _com_issue_error(E_POINTER);
        }

        return m_pInterface == nullptr;
    }

Line 450-458

    bool operator!=(int null) const
    {
        if (null != 0)
        {
            _com_issue_error(E_POINTER);
        }

        return m_pInterface != nullptr;
    }

CMFCRibbonComboBox

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.44.35207\atlmfc\include\afxribboncombobox.h:

Line 42-48

// Construction:
public:
	CMFCRibbonComboBox(UINT nID, BOOL bHasEditBox = TRUE, int nWidth = -1, LPCTSTR lpszLabel = NULL, int nImage = -1);
	virtual ~CMFCRibbonComboBox();

protected:
	CMFCRibbonComboBox();

Copy link
Contributor

@Rageking8 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 849b468:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/cpp/com-ptr-t-relational-operators.md ✅Succeeded
docs/mfc/reference/cmfcribboncombobox-class.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@TylerMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Aug 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants